Investigating Predictive Models Based on Circulating Cell-free INK4A DNA Methylation, Alpha-fetoprotein, Platelet Count, and Age for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Rebecca Waters, Yan Xie, Gengming Huang , Karam Hadidi , Elijah Lohman, Roger Soloway , Peter Hu
Affiliation
- 1Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, USA
- 2Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
- 3Molecular Genetic Technology Program, School of Health Sciences, University of Texas, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- #These authors contributed equally to this study
Corresponding Author
Jianli Dong, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Clinical Services Wing 5.140, L38253, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, Texas 77555-0743, USA, Tel: (409) 772-4866, E-mail: jidong@utmb.edu
Citation
Dong, J., et al. Investigating Predictive Models Based on Circulating Cell-free INK4A DNA Methylation, Alpha-fetoprotein, Platelet Count, and Age for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. (2016) J Clin Trials Pathol Case Stud 1(1): 29- 34.
Copy rights
© 2016 Dong, J. This is an Open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Background: As Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) rates continue to rise in the U.S., management remains limited with lack of adequate markers to diagnose patients at early stage when there is curative therapy. Hyper methylation of CpG dinucleotides in the promoter region of inhibitor cyclin-dependent kinase 4A (INK4A) has been shown to be a potential biomarker associated with HCC. Additional laboratory measurements including total gamma globulin, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and platelet count levels have been suggested as potential markers for HCC. In this study, we examined the combined use of these markers in HCC and non-HCC patients to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of HCC.
Design: We examined INK4A promoter methylation using circulating cell-free DNA in serum specimens from patients with HCC and without HCC. Methylation for seven CpG sites was examined using pyrosequencing. The following additional sets of data were recorded: patient age, sex, AFP level, total gamma globulin level, platelet count, and presence or absence of viral hepatitis. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression procedure in Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 8.0.
Results: In our study, a total of 153 serum specimens were analyzed, all from different subjects (74 HCC and 79 non-HCC patients), 136 (89%) were male, and 17 (11%) were female. The average age was 54.5 years (standard deviation 8.68). Of the 74 subjects with HCC, 24 (32.44%) were stage 1, 18 (24.32%) were stage 2, 16 (21.62%) were stage 3, and 16 (21.62%) were stage 4. Older subjects were more likely to have HCC than the younger subjects group (means in HCC and non-HCC groups were 56 years and 52 years, respectively, p = 0.03). High AFP values were associated with HCC (means in HCC and non-HCC groups were 1583 and 318, respectively, p < 0.01) as were low platelet values (means in HCC and non-HCC groups were 131 and 151, respectively, p = 0.03). INK4A methylation was significantly associated with stage 3 and 4 HCC (odds ratio > 1000, p = 0.02). Among INK4A, AFP, platelets, gamma globulin, and age, only INK4A and AFP were statistically significant when comparing stages 1 and 2 with stages 3 and 4 [probability of stages 1 and 2 = 1/ (1 + exp(- (1.44 - 10.84* INK4A-0.00003*AFP)].
Conclusions: Older age, high AFP, and low platelet are associated HCC. Similarly, INK4A promoter methylation rates and AFP are associated with advanced HCC stage.
Introduction
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related deaths in the world[1]. As HCC rates continue to rise in the U.S., management has remained limited with lack of adequate diagnostic markers. Also, despite the various treatment strategies available for treatment, the survival rate remains low because of the limitations in early diagnosis. Thus, an urgent need exists to develop a useful diagnostic strategy for early identification of HCC.
Several changes/markers have been identified that have an integral role in the induction and progression of HCC[2,3]. Hyper methylation of CpG dinucleotides in the promoter region of inhibitor cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4A (INK4A) has been reported in 60 - 80% of HCC[4-8]. INK4A encodes p16 protein, an important cell cycle regulator and inhibitor of cell cycle proliferation. The hyper methylation of INK4A ultimately results in blocked and decreased INK4A RNA in HCC specimensA[9-11], resulting in reduced p16 expression and tumour cell progression. Research has demonstrated potential utility in the “liquid biopsy” for solid tumours. Data has demonstrated that increasing amounts of cell-free tumour DNA and also methylated INK4A DNA are released into the blood as HCC progresses[12-15]. This “liquid biopsy” may provide a non-invasive alternative to traditional surgical biopsy procedures for cancer monitoring and detection in high-risk patients. It may also yield a better means of early cancer detection in high risk patients, identify resistance mutations, and monitor response to therapy.
In addition to circulating cell-free INK4A DNA methylation status, other laboratory measurements including total gamma globulin, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and platelet count have been suggested as potential markers for HCC[16]. In this study, we examined INK4A methylation using circulating cell-free DNA and the laboratory profiles of several markers of both HCC and non-HCC patients. Our objective was to create a predictive model for diagnosis and prognosis of HCC.
Materials and Methods
Blood specimens
This study included 153 blood specimens collected during the period of May 2013 to May 2014 from 74 patients with HCC and 79 with benign liver diseases (chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis). Samples were processed as described previously[17]. Briefly, whole blood samples were collected without preservatives and stored at 4°C, serum was then separated within 72 h and stored at −70°C until DNA extraction[18]. The diagnoses of HCC and benign liver disease (hepatitis and cirrhosis) were based on imaging characteristics, AFP, pathology evaluation, and past medical history following established practice guidelines[19,20]. The following additional sets of data were recorded: patient age, sex, AFP level, total gamma globulin level, platelet count, and presence or absence of viral hepatitis. The study was approved by the UTMB Institutional Review Board (IRB).
INK4A DNA methylation assay
For the INK4A methylation assay, the QIA vac 24 Plus and QIA amp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) was used to extract and purify genomic DNA from 1 - 2 ml of serum according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sodium bisulfite treatment with the EpiTect Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) was used for the conversion of unmethylated cytosine to uracil in the genomic DNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After the conversion reaction and a cleanup step, bisulfite-converted DNA was eluted in a 30 μL elution buffer and used for methylation analysis. Bisulfite-treated genomic DNA was PCR amplified using P16 Pyro-Mark PCR Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). The biotinylated PCR amplicons from 10 μL of PCR reaction mix was captured on streptavidin-coated beads and underwent pyrosequencing using PyroMarkQ24 CpG p16 Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). The methylated fraction (%) of each of the seven CpG sites was measured by pyro-sequencing as described previously[21].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression procedure in Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 8.0. Differences were considered significant at the α level of 0.05 for two-sided tests.
Results
We analyzed a total of 153 serum specimens from different subjects (74 HCC patients and 79 Non-HCC patients). The baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. One hundred and thirty-six of the subjects (89%) were male and 17 (11%) were female. Average age was 54.5 years (standard deviation 8.68). Of the 153 subjects, 142 (93%) were infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Of the remaining 11 subjects (7%), there were 2 subjects with hepatitis B virus (HBV), 3 with alcohol-induced liver disease, 3 with autoimmune hepatitis, and 3 with liver disease from unknown etiology.
Table 1: Clinical characteristics of 153 subjects with and without HCC.
Characteristics | N (%) or mean (SD) |
---|---|
Total | 153 |
Male | 136 (89) |
Female | 17 (11) |
Age | 54.5 (8.69) |
HCV | 142 (93) |
HBV | 2 (1) |
Alcohol-induced liver disease | 3 (2) |
Autoimmune liver disease | 3 (2) |
Unknown etiology | 3 (2) |
Hepatitis/cirrhosis | 79 (52) |
HCC | 74 (48) |
Table 2 represents the average INK4A methylation levels of the individual seven CpG sites assessed using serum samples from patients diagnosed with HCC (74 samples from 74 patients) and benign chronic liver diseases (79 samples from 79 patients). Methylation of the individual seven specific CpG sites was quantified using pyro-sequencing. The highest value of methylation of the seven CpG sites was used for each of the samples. Table 3 summarizes the laboratory results and age distribution of subjects from both the HCC and non-HCC groups. Mean AFP values were higher in HCC group than non-HCC group (means in HCC and non-HCC groups were 1583 and 318, respectively, p < 0.01), as were INK4A methylation rate (means in HCC and non-HCC groups were 9.8 and 5.1, respectively, p < 0.01). Subjects from HCC group were older (means in HCC and non-HCC groups were 56 years and 52 years, respectively, p < 0.01) and had lower mean albumin levels (means in HCC and non-HCC groups were 3.3 and 3.7, respectively, p < 0.01). There was no difference in the average platelet and total globulin levels between the HCC and non-HCC groups.
Table 2: Average INK4A methylation rates of 7 CPG sites analyzed.
CPG site 1 | CPG site 2 | CPG site 3 | CPG site 4 | CPG site 5 | CPG site 6 | CPG site 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCC | 5.34% | 7.22% | 4.83% | 5.34% | 7.56% | 4.9% | 4.68% |
No HCC | 1.90% | 3.15% | 1.25% | 2.30% | 2.75% | 1.44% | 1.59% |
Table 3: The laboratory results and ages for subjects with and without HCC. Univariate analysis.
Variables | HCC | Non-HCC | P-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of subjects | Mean (minimum, maximum) | Number of subjects | Mean (minimum, maximum) | ||
AFP (IU/ml) | 74 | 15863.3 (3.9, 217000.0) | 79 | 317.9 (1.0, 5060.0) | < 0.01 |
Platelet ( 10³/microliter) | 72 | 131.3 (34.0, 422.0) | 72 | 151.7 (45.0, 516.0) | 0.12 |
Albumin (g/dL) | 72 | 3.3 (1.7, 4.7) | 72 | 3.7 (2.3, 5.0) | < 0.01 |
Total globulin (g/dL) | 72 | 4.0 (1.9, 6.2) | 72 | 3.8 (2.7, 5.9) | 0.30 |
Age (yrs.) | 72 | 56.8 (27.0, 89.0) | 78 | 52.4 (21.0, 67.0) | < 0.01 |
INK4A methylation (%) | 72 | 9.8 (0, 0.8) | 79 | 5.1(0, 21) | < 0.01 |
Results from multivariate analysis for determining independent factors associated with HCC were summarized in Table 4. Overall, older age (p = 0.02) and high AFP values (p = 0.01) were both associated with HCC. None of the remaining laboratory values (platelets, total globulin, albumin, and INK4A methylation rate) were independent factors associated with HCC. Table 5 shows a summary of the stages of HCC in 73 of 74 subjects. Of the 74 subjects with HCC, 1 subject did not have a listed stage. Approximately 56% (41 of 73) had stages 1 and 2, and 44% (32 of 73) had advanced stages (3 and 4). Positive methylation status at 5% and 10% was seen in 46% (19 of the 41) and 15% (6 out of 41) of the early stage group, respectively. Much higher rates were seen in the advanced stage group, with 91% (29 out of 32) and 47% (15 out of 32) at 5% and 10% limits of detection, respectively.
Table 4: Multivariate analysis for determining independent factors associated with HCC.
Variables | Odds ratio | P-value |
---|---|---|
AFP (IU/ml) | 1.001 | 0.01 |
Platelet ( 10³/microliter) | 0.995 | 0.18 |
Albumin (g/dL) | 0.652 | 0.22 |
Totalglobulin (g/dL) | 0.893 | 0.70 |
Age (yrs.) | 1.067 | 0.02 |
INK4A methylation (%) | 62.542 | 0.30 |
Table 5: Summary of the stages of 73 subjects with stages.
Stages | N (%) | INK4A methylation (5% LOD) | INK4A methylation (10% LOD) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 24 (33) | - | - |
2 | 17 (23) | - | - |
Early stage (I and II) | 41 (56) | 46% (19/41) | 15% (6/41) |
3 | 16 (22) | - | - |
4 | 16 (22) | - | - |
Late stage (III and IV) | 32 (44) | 91%(29/32) | 47%(15/32) |
Note: One subject with HCC had no listed stage, and is not summarized in this table.
Laboratory results and age distribution of subjects from both the early and late stages of HCC were summarized in Table 6. Mean AFP values were higher in the late stage group (means in early and late stage groups were 3670.9 and 31968.8, respectively, p = 0.03), as were INK4A methylation rates (means in early and late stage groups were 5.9 and 14.7, respectively, p = 0.01). Subjects from late stage of HCC were older (means in early and late stage groups were 55.9 years and 58.1 years, respectively, p = 0.03) and had lower mean albumin levels (means in early and late stage groups were 3.5 and 3.1, respectively, p = 0.01). There was no difference in mean platelet levels or mean total globulin levels between the early and late stage HCC groups. Results from multivariate analysis for determining independent factors associated with late stage HCC were shown in Table 7. High AFP values were associated with late stage HCC (p value = 0.04), as were INK4A methylation rates (p value = 0.03). Low platelet values (p = 0.03) and low albumin levels (p = 0.02) were also associated with late stage HCC. Age or the total globulin levels were not independent factor associated with late stage HCC when compared to early stage HCC.
Table 6: The laboratory results and age distribution for subjects with HCC by HCC stage. Univariate analysis.
Variables | Early (stages I & II) | Late (stages III & IV) | P-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of subjects | Mean (minimum, maximum) | Number of subjects | Mean (minimum, maximum) | ||
AFP (IU/ml) | 41 | 3670.9 (3.9, 98600.0) | 32 | 31968.8 (18.0) | 0.03 |
Platelet ( 10³/microliter) | 40 | 118.1 (34.0, 284.0) | 31 | 147.9 (57.0, 422.0) | 0.11 |
Albumin (g/dL) | 40 | 3.5 (1.7, 4.7) | 31 | 3.1 (2.1, 4.3) | 0.01 |
Total globulin (g/dL) | 40 | 4.0 (2.1, 6.2) | 31 | 4.0 (1.9, 5.9) | 0.84 |
Age (yrs.) | 39 | 55.9 (40.0, 69.0) | 32 | 58.1 (27.0, 89.0) | 0.03 |
INK4A methylation (%) | 39 | 5.9 (0, 25) | 32 | 14.7(2.0, 77.0) | 0.01 |
INK4A methylation, > 10% | 41 | 6 (14.6) | 32 | 15 (46.9) | < 0.01 |
Table 7: Multivariate analysis for determining independent factors associated with late stage of HCC.
Variables | Odds ratio | P-value |
---|---|---|
AFP (IU/ml) | 1.00003 | 0.04 |
Platelet ( 10³/microliter) | 1.015 | 0.03 |
Albumin (g/dL) | 0.254 | 0.02 |
Total globulin (g/dL) | 0.825 | 0.64 |
Age (yrs.) | 0.983 | 0.64 |
INK4A methylation (%) | 92836.9 | 0.03 |
Note: The reference stage is early stage.
Discussion
In this study, age, AFP, total globulin, albumin, platelet value, and circulating cell-free INK4A promoter methylation were evaluated retrospectively in patients with HCC and benign liver diseases. To our knowledge, our study is the first to investigate a combination of circulating INK4A methylation status with laboratory values (AFP, platelet values, total gamma globulin) in subjects with liver disease. Older age and high AFP levels were associated with HCC. Similarly, INK4A promoter methylation rates, high AFP, low platelet, and low albumin levels were associated with advanced HCC stage. Our findings suggest that these measurements may provide clinical utility as future model for monitoring patients with HCC.
Despite the current recommendation for all cirrhotic patients to undergo consistent surveillance for HCC, the 5 year survival rate for HCC remains low. Small liver nodules (less than 2 cm in size) cannot be accurately diagnosed with imaging studies, and this prompts clinicians to monitor them until they increase in size and reach a definitive diagnosis of HCC. Thus, many of these patients are diagnosed after the cancer has reached an advanced stage. Another problem with this surveillance model is that it is expensive, cumbersome, and it fails to properly separate patients with low vs. high likelihood of developing HCC. Under-surveillance of high-risk patients leads to late stage tumor detection, and over-surveillance of patients with a low risk causes unnecessary expenses and potential harm from unnecessary procedures[22,23]. Therefore, accurately predicting HCC by initiating detection and chemo preventive efforts in high-risk patients and avoiding these efforts in low-risk patients may potentially reduce the cost burden while providing personalized care.
Several variables have been previously described by different authors as being significantly associated with HCC development, including portal hypertension[24], older age[24,25], diabetes[26], alkaline phosphatase[24], lower platelet counts[24,25], albumin[27], and higher baseline values of AFP[28], and gamma globulin[29]. Gavilan and colleagues found similar results when they followed and evaluated 829 patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection for approximately 82 months[30] A total of 58 (7%) of the 829 developed HCC. By constructing a risk score using multivariate analysis, they concluded that advanced age, elevated AFP and gamma globulin, and low platelet counts (< 150,000) were independent predictors of HCC. They also discovered that the average time to develop HCC was significantly shorter in the high-risk group compared to the low- and intermediate-risk groups. The authors concluded that their predictive model could be used to identify a high-risk subgroup of patients with an annual HCC incidence of 2.6%, in which the screening would be cost-effective. Our study had similar findings to previous studies in that advanced age and elevated AFP were associated with HCC. Unlike these studies, however, none of platelet, albumin or total globulin levels were associated with HCC. The reason of the difference is not clear. It may be attributed to Gavilan’s larger subject size, and consequently, higher numbers of subjects with more advanced liver disease compared to our study. Our study also evaluated and incorporated INK4A methylation status as a variable, which was not examined previously[30].
INK4A hyper methylation has been identified in several studies as a risk factor for HCC[31-38], however, all of these studies used methylation specific PCR (MSP) to evaluate methylation status. MSP is an allele-specific PCR assay that depends on sodium bisulfite converting cytosine to uracil[12]. This method is problematic for several reasons. One problem is the heterozygous epi-alleles that exist after CpG sequence conversion with sodium bisulfite[38]. Additional disadvantages include the assay’s inability to quantify levels of methylation and identify specific CpG dinucleotides that are methylated. Establishing quantification levels of methylation is important because benign liver diseases can express low levels of methylation. Many of these levels may not be biologically significant; therefore, establishing a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) provides a more accurate assessment of tumor-specific methylation. Pyro-sequencing is a semi-quantitative method for evaluating INK4A hyper methylation because it measures the percent of methylation from its calculated C:T (methylated: unmethylated) ratio at specific CpG sites. This quantitative ability adds value because a percentage of methylation can be established.
In a previous study[21], we examined INK4A promoter methylation by pyrosequencing using circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) in 109 patients, including 66 with HCC and 43 with benign chronic liver disease. The results found significantly higher levels of methylated INK4A in HCC specimens than the non-HCC group. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.82, with 65.3% sensitivity and 87.2% specificity at 5% limit of detection (LOD), 39.0% sensitivity and 96.5% specificity at 7% LOD, and 20.3% sensitivity and 98.8% specificity at 10% LOD, respectively. The results showed that INK4A methylation testing of ccfDNA could be a valuable biomarker with regards to diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic characteristics in HCC patients. In this study, ccfDNA was examined by pyro-sequencing as in our previous study[39], and other factors, including age, platelet count, and AFP value were examined using multivariate analysis. In addition to INK4A methylation, AFP was also identified as a prognostic indicator of early vs. advanced stage. This suggests that both AFP and INK4A methylation levels from circulating cell free DNA may be useful predictors of advanced HCC. Gavilan and colleagues concluded in their study that older age, elevated AFP and gamma globulin, and low platelet levels were independent predictors of HCC[12]. Therefore, these variables may indeed be valuable measurements in diagnosing early HCC.
Our data reflects that levels of circulating methylated INK4A correlate with and may also complement levels of AFP to improve the positivity in advanced stage HCC; the positive rates were 96.9%, 91.0%, and 100% in the 32 HCC cases for AFP, INK4A methylation, and in combination, respectively, using LOD cut-offs of 200 μg/L for AFP[12] and 5% for INK4A methylation[21]. Similarly, the positive rates were 96.9%, 46.9%, and 96.9% in the 32 cases for AFP, INK4A methylation, and in combination, respectively, using LOD cut-offs of 200 μg/L for AFP and 10% for INK4A methylation. Supporting this notion, it has been reported that adding INK4A methylation status to AFP can increase the diagnostic sensitivity of HCC from 60% to 80%[39], however, no previous studies have examined this relationship to advanced-stage HCC. Additional investigations including prospective studies and more sophisticated INK4A methylation assay with higher sensitivity and specificity are needed to examine the clinical performance of the INK4A assay for HCC diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring treatment.
Acknowledge:
Supported in part by grants from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Center Grant (P30 ES006676) and a Clinical and Translational Science Award (8UL1 TR000071) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health.
References
- 1. Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M.M., et al. Global cancer statistics. (2011) CA Cancer J Clin 61(2): 69–90.
- 2. Hoshida, Y., Toffanin, S., Lachenmayer, A., et al. Molecular classification and novel targets in hepato-cellular carcinoma: recent advancements. (2010) Semin Liver Dis 30(1): 35–51.
- 3. Ozturk, M., Arslan-Ergul, A., Bagislar, S., et al. Senescence and immortality in hepatocellular carcinoma. (2009) Cancer Lett 286(1): 103–113.
- 4. Bruix, J., Sherman, M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. (2011) Hepatology 53(3): 1020–1022.
- 5. Torzilli, G., Minagawa, M., Takayama, T., et al. Accurate preoperative evaluation of liver mass lesions without fine-needle biopsy. (1999) Hepatology 30(4): 889–893.
- 6. Bruix, J., Llovet, J.M. Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. (2002) Hepatology 35(3): 519–524.
- 7. Cox, D. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). (1972) J R Stat Soc B 34(2): 187–220.
- 8. Heagerty, P.J., Lumley, T., Pepe, M.S. Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. (2000) Biometrics 56(2): 337–344.
- 9. Merlo, A., Herman, J.G., Mao, L., et al. 5’ CpG island methylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the tumour suppressor p16/CDKN2/MTS1 in human cancers. (1995) Nat Med 1(7): 686–692.
- 10. Nishida, N., Kudo, M., Nagasaka, T., et al. Characteristic patterns of altered DNA methylation predict emergence of human hepatocellular carcinoma. (2012) Hepatology 56(3): 994–1003.
- 11. Wang, Y., Cheng, J., Xu, C., et al. Quantitative methylation analysis reveals gender and age differences in p16INK4a hypermethylation in hepatitis B virus-related hepato-cellular carcinoma. (2011) Liver Int 32(3): 420–428.
- 12. Wong, I.H., Zhang, J., Lai, P.B., et al. Quantitative analysis of tumor-derived methylated p16INK4a sequences in plasma, serum, and blood cells of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. (2003) Clin Cancer Res 9(3): 1047–1052.
- 13. Zhang, Y.j., Wu, H.C., Shen, J., et al. Predicting hepatocellular carcinoma by detection of aberrant promoter methylation in serum DNA. (2007) Clin Cancer Res 13(8): 2378-2384.
- 14. Song do S., Bae, S.H. Changes of guidelines diagnosing hepato-cellular carcinoma during the last ten-year period. (2012) Clin Mol Hepatol 18(3): 258–267.
- 15. Zainuddin, N., Kanduri, M., Berglund, M., et al. Quantitative evaluation of p16 (INK4a) promoter methylation using Pyrosequencing in de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. (2011) Leuk Res 35(4): 438–443.
- 16. Gavilán, J.C., Ojeda, G., Arnedo, R., et al. Predictive factors of risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C. (2013) Eur J Intern Med 24(8): 846-851.
- 17. Schwarzenbach, H., Hoon, D.S., Pantel, K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. (2011) Nat Rev Cancer 11: 426-437.
- 18. Holdenrieder, S., Strieber, P., Chan, L.Y., et al. Cell-free DNA in serum and plasma: comparison of ELISA and quantitative PCR. (2005) Clin Chem 51(8): 1544–1546.
- 19. Edge, S.B., Compton, C.C. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. (2010) Ann Surg Oncol 17(6): 1471–1474.
- 20. Song do S., Bae, S.H. Changes of guidelines diagnosing hepato-cellular carcinoma during the last ten-year period. (2012) Clin Mol Hepatol 18(3): 258–267.
- 21. Huang, G., Krocker, J.D., Kirk, J.L., et al. Evaluation of INK4A promoter methylation using Pyrosequencing and circulating cell-free DNA from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. (2014) Clin Chem Lab Med 52(6): 899–909.
- 22. Lok, A.S., Seeff, L.B., Morgan, T.R., et al. Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma and associated risk factors in hepatitis C-related advanced liver disease. (2009) Gastroenterology 136(1): 138–148.
- 23. Kurosaki, M., Hiramatsu, N., Sakamoto, M., et al. Data mining model using simple and readily available factors could identify patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C. (2012) J Hepatol 56(3): 602–628.
- 24. El-Serag, H.B., Tran, T., Everhart, J.E. Diabetes increases the risk of chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. (2004) Gastroenterology 126(2): 460–468.
- 25. Bonis, P.A., Tong, M.J., Blatt, L.M., et al. A predictive model for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, liver failure, or liver transplantation for patients presenting to clinic with chronic hepatitis C. (1999) Am J Gastroenterol 94(6): 1605–1612.
- 26. Sato, Y., Nakata, K., Kato, Y., et al. Early recognition of hepatocellular carcinoma based on altered profiles of alpha-fetoprotein. (1993) N Engl J Med 328: 1802–1806.
- 27. Cristani, A., Cioni, G., Tincani, E., et al. Normal gamma globulin levels in liver cirrhosis: a prognostic indicator and improved survival. (1991) Recenti Prog Med 82(1): 9–12.
- 28. Gavilán, J.C., Ojeda, G., Arnedo, R., et al. Predictive factors of risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C. (2013) Eur J Intern Med 24(8): 846-851.
- 29. Wong, I.H., Lo, Y.M., Zhang, J., et al. Detection of aberrant p16 methylation in the plasma and serum of liver cancer patients. (1999) Cancer Res 59(1): 71–73.
- 30. Wong, I.H., Lo, Y.M., Lai, P.B., et al. Relationship of p16 methylation status and serum alpha-fetoprotein concentration in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. (2000) Clin Chem 46(9): 1420–1422.
- 31. Zhang, Y.J., Wu, H.C., Shen, J., et al. Predicting hepatocellular carcinoma by detection of aberrant promoter methylation in serum DNA. (2007) Clin Cancer Res 13(8): 2378–2384.
- 32. Chu, H.J., Heo, J., Seo, S.B., et al. Detection of aberrant p16INK4A methylation in sera of patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. (2004) J Korean Med Sci 19(1): 83–86.
- 33. Zhang, Y.J., Rossner, P. Jr., Chen, Y., et al. Aflatoxin B1 and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon adducts p53 mutations and p16 methylation in liver tissue and plasma of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. (2006) Int J Cancer 119(5): 985–991.
- 34. Chang, H., Yi, B., Li, L., et al. Methylation of tumor associated genes in tissue and plasma samples from liver disease patients. (2008) Exp Mol Pathol 85(2): 96–100.
- 35. Iyer, P., Zekri, A.R., Hung, C.W., et al. Concordance of DNA methylation pattern in plasma and tumor DNA of Egyptian hepatocellular carcinoma patients. (2010) Exp Mol Pathol 88: 107–111.
- 36. Herman, J.G., Graff, J.R., Myohanen, S., et al. Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. (1996) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(18): 9821–9826.
- 37. Mikeska, T., Candiloro, I.L., Dobrovic, A. The implications of heterogeneous DNA methylation for the accurate quantification of methylation. (2010) Epigenomics 2(4): 561–573.
- 38. Fleischhacker, M., Schmidt, B. Cell-free DNA resuscitated for tumor testing. (2008) Nat Med 14(9): 914-915.
- 39. Kaneto, H., Sasaki, S., Yamamoto, H., et al. Detection of hypermethylation of the p16 (INK4A) gene promoter in chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis associated with hepatitis B or C virus. (2001) Gut 48(3): 372–377